|
|
Welcome to the World of Pulitzer Prize Winning Political Cartoonist Michael P. Ramirez |
Yearbook 10-03-18
Michael is the daily editorial cartoonist for the Las Vegas Review Journal View all 2018 cartoons HERE
McConnell firm on Kavanaugh vote this week as FBI criticized
By Alan Fram, Michael Balsamo and Eric Tucker The Associated Press October 2, 2018 - 5:12 pm WASHINGTON — Lawyers for two women who accuse Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct say they fear the FBI is not conducting a thorough investigation, as Republican leaders steer toward a decisive vote on the nomination this week. Attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, who says she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh at a party when they were teenagers, wrote a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray asking why the FBI hasn’t contacted their client after she offered to cooperate in the FBI’s reopened background investigation of Kavanaugh. read more at Las Vegas Review Journal
Pre-order Michael P. Ramirez art for holiday gift givingClick on art below for details
POSTED ON OCTOBER 3, 2018 BY STEVEN HAYWARD POWERLINE THE LEFT DECLARES TOTAL WAR If it wasn’t already evident that even if Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed to the Supreme Court in a few days the left will carry on with a full-scale attack (including an impeachment investigation), then the email below from Harold Meyerson of The American Prospect sent out yesterday makes the matter explicit. I’ll intersperse my comments in places: The Back-Up Way of Defeating Kavanaugh. Assume the worst: Let’s posit that within a week, despite the evidence of his abuses when young, his temperament when middle-aged, and his unyieldingly troglodytic beliefs at all times, Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed as a Supreme Court justice. That, of course, would create the first hard-right majority on the Court since 1937—a majority dead-set against modernity, equal rights for women and minorities, and any rights at all for workers. What to do then? Comment: Actually, in 1937 was when a slightly conservative (but very inconsistent) majority on the Supreme Court ended, according to legend (subsequently controverted by historians) buckling to pressure from FDR. But as for “against modernity, equal rights for women,” would that include those earlier “conservative” decisions like Adkins v. Childrens Hospitalthat struck down legislation that was discriminatory against women in the workplace? It is always amusing to see leftists tapdance around the actual facts and reasoning in cases that they’ve never actually read. I could go on, but let’s continue: read the rest at Powerline
|
![]() Click HERE to activate a free subscription of Hillsdale's Imprimis magazine for yourself or a friend.
|